Luco v. Commercial Bank

8 P. 274, 2 Cal. Unrep. 549
California Supreme Court·Decided October 14, 1885·No. No. 11,016·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

By the COURT.

A motion is made to dismiss the appeal, which is from an interlocutory decree in partition, on the ground that the notice of appeal was not served on all of the adverse parties. As the notice was not so served, the motion must be granted. Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luco v. Commercial Bank, 8 P. 274, 2 Cal. Unrep. 549 (Cal. 1885).

8 P. 274 (Luco v. Commercial Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jones v. Quantrell
9 P. 418 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1886)