Luco v. Commercial Bank
8 P. 274, 2 Cal. Unrep. 549
This text of 8 P. 274 (Luco v. Commercial Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Luco v. Commercial Bank, 8 P. 274, 2 Cal. Unrep. 549 (Cal. 1885).
Opinion
A motion is made to dismiss the appeal, which is from an interlocutory decree in partition, on the ground that the notice of appeal was not served on all of the adverse parties. As the notice was not so served, the motion must be granted. Ordered accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Jones v. Quantrell
9 P. 418 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1886)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
8 P. 274, 2 Cal. Unrep. 549, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luco-v-commercial-bank-cal-1885.