Lucky Enterprises Inc v. Jamal John Hamood

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided April 25, 2011·No. 142178·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

April 25, 2011 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

142178 Michael F. Cavanagh Marilyn Kelly Stephen J. Markman Diane M. Hathaway Mary Beth Kelly LUCKY ENTERPRISES, INC., and Brian K. Zahra, CHARLES AGHAJOUN, Justices Plaintiffs-Appellees, v SC: 142178 COA: 293632 Oakland CC: 2007-084144-NM JAMAL JOHN HAMOOD, Defendant-Appellant,

and

WILLIAM J. RUNCO, MICHAEL J. FERGESTROM, HAMOOD, RUNCO & FERGESTROM, P.C., HAMOOD AND FERGESTROM, P.C., and CARLY PUMMELL, Defendants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 19, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. April 25, 2011 _________________________________________ h0418 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lucky Enterprises Inc v. Jamal John Hamood, (Mich. 2011).

Lucky Enterprises Inc v. Jamal John Hamood (Lucky Enterprises Inc v. Jamal John Hamood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.