Lucky Bros. v. Phillips

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Lucky Bros. v. Phillips

93 S.E. 43, 20 Ga. App. 416, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 920

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 29, 1917

Docket8555

StatusPublished

This text of 93 S.E. 43 (Lucky Bros. v. Phillips) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lucky Bros. v. Phillips, 93 S.E. 43, 20 Ga. App. 416, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 920 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

Where the judgment overruling a certiorari recites that the petition for certiorari came on to be tried “upon the answer as made by the magistrate to the petition, together with certain amendments agreed upon by the parties verbally,” and that after considering the same the certiorari was overruled, and it does not appear what the amendments or verbal agreements were, this court can not say that the court erred in overruling the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, O. J., and George, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

Where the judgment overruling a certiorari recites that the petition for certiorari came on to be tried “upon the answer as made by the magistrate to the petition, together with certain amendments agreed upon by the parties verbally,” and that after considering the same the certiorari was overruled, and it does not appear what the amendments or verbal agreements were, this court can not say that the court erred in overruling the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, O. J., and George, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

93 S.E. 43, 20 Ga. App. 416, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 920, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lucky-bros-v-phillips-gactapp-1917.