Luckey v. Santellan

328 S.W.3d 738, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1719, 2010 WL 5070733
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 14, 2010·No. WD 71653·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Bridget Luckey appeals the trial court’s judgment dismissing her personal injury claim for failure to comply with the court’s orders requiring her to provide supplemental responses to discovery requests. On appeal, Luckey claims that the trial court abused its discretion in dismissing her action with prejudice without a hearing and in entering the underlying discovery orders. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luckey v. Santellan, 328 S.W.3d 738, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1719, 2010 WL 5070733 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

328 S.W.3d 738 (Luckey v. Santellan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Hamilton
328 S.W.3d 738 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)