Luckett v. State

590 So. 2d 955, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11514, 1991 WL 268712
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 19, 1991
DocketNo. 91-485
StatusPublished

This text of 590 So. 2d 955 (Luckett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Luckett v. State, 590 So. 2d 955, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11514, 1991 WL 268712 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

There was no error or abuse of discretion in the trial court’s replacement of a juror, who apparently did not arrive at a session on time, with a duly-chosen alternate. See United States v. Makres, 598 F.2d 1072 (7th Cir.1979); United States v. Domenech, 476 F.2d 1229 (2d Cir.1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 840, 94 S.Ct. 95, 38 L.Ed.2d 77 (1973). See generally Orosz v. State, 389 So.2d 1199, 1200 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980) (“The conduct of jurors is the responsibility of the court and the court is allowed discretion in dealing with any problems that arise.”).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Angel Domenech
476 F.2d 1229 (Second Circuit, 1973)
United States v. Peter A. Makres
598 F.2d 1072 (Seventh Circuit, 1979)
Orosz v. State
389 So. 2d 1199 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
590 So. 2d 955, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11514, 1991 WL 268712, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luckett-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.