Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Luckenbill v. Midwestern Indemn. Co.

Luckenbill v. Midwestern Indemn. Co.

764 N.E.2d 1035, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1504, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 709
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 20, 2002
Docket01-1678
StatusPublished

This text of 764 N.E.2d 1035 (Luckenbill v. Midwestern Indemn. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Luckenbill v. Midwestern Indemn. Co., 764 N.E.2d 1035, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1504, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 709 (Ohio 2002).

Opinion

Darke App. No. 01CA1536. On motion to dismiss based on mootness of conflict. Motion denied.

Douglas, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur but would hold this cause for the decision in 01-1474 and 01-1867, Hillyer v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., Cuyahoga App. No. 79176. Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents and would grant the motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
764 N.E.2d 1035, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1504, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luckenbill-v-midwestern-indemn-co-ohio-2002.