Luck v. Fisk

New York Court of Appeals

Luck v. Fisk

688 N.E.2d 1035, 90 N.Y.2d 979, 665 N.Y.S.2d 953, 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 3223

New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 22, 1997·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division. We note, however, that nothing in this Court’s affirmance implies that, under Election Law § 9-209 (2) (d), the central board of inspectors has the discretion not to open the ballot envelopes and count the votes after the three-day set-aside period.

[982] Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick and Wesley concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division. We note, however, that nothing in this Court’s affirmance implies that, under Election Law § 9-209 (2) (d), the central board of inspectors has the discretion not to open the ballot envelopes and count the votes after the three-day set-aside period.

[982] Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick and Wesley concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.

Luck v. Fisk, 688 N.E.2d 1035, 90 N.Y.2d 979, 665 N.Y.S.2d 953, 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 3223 (N.Y. 1997).

Pincite

688 N.E.2d 1035 (Luck v. Fisk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related