Lucious Ray Johnson v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 13, 2015
Docket14-14-00504-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Lucious Ray Johnson v. State (Lucious Ray Johnson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lucious Ray Johnson v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Order filed August 12, 2014

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-14-00504-CR ____________

LUCIOUS RAY JOHNSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 176th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 0263473

ORDER

Appellant is not represented by counsel on appeal. This court is unaware whether appellant is entitled to appointment of counsel. Accordingly, we enter the following order.

We ORDER the judge of the 176th District Court to immediately conduct a hearing at which appellant and counsel for the State shall be present to determine whether appellant desires to prosecute his appeal, and, if so, whether appellant is entitled to appointed counsel. The judge shall appoint appellate counsel for appellant, if necessary. The judge shall see that a record of the hearing is made, shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law, and shall order the trial clerk to forward a record of the hearing and a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings and conclusions. Those records shall be filed with the clerk of this court within thirty days of the date of this order.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when the trial court’s findings and recommendations are filed in this Court. The Court will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the Court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion. It is the responsibility of any party seeking reinstatement to request a hearing date from the trial court and to schedule a hearing in compliance with this Court’s order. If the parties do not request a hearing, the court coordinator of the trial court shall set a hearing date and notify the parties of such date.

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lucious Ray Johnson v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lucious-ray-johnson-v-state-texapp-2015.