Lucious Boyd v. State of Florida
Opinion
Supreme Court of Florida THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 2, 2021
CASE NO.: SC20-108 Lower Tribunal No(s).: 061999CF005809A88810
LUCIOUS BOYD vs. STATE OF FLORIDA
Appellant(s) Appellee(s)
Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing is hereby denied.
CANADY, C.J., and POLSTON, LABARGA, LAWSON, MUÑIZ, COURIEL, and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur. LABARGA, J., concurs specially with an opinion.
LABARGA, J., specially concurring.
Although I adhere to my dissent in Boyd v. State, 46 Fla. L.
Weekly S124 (Fla. May 13, 2021), wherein I concluded that Boyd’s
claim of juror misconduct was facially sufficient, I agree that Boyd’s
motion for rehearing fails to establish a basis for granting
rehearing.
A True Copy Test:
so CASE NO.: SC20-108 Page Two
Served:
LESLIE T. CAMPBELL SCOTT GAVIN SUZANNE MYERS KEFFER
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lucious Boyd v. State of Florida (Lucious Boyd v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.