Lucio Flores Ortega,petitioner-Appellant v. Ernest C. Roe, Warden,order

Ninth Circuit

Lucio Flores Ortega,petitioner-Appellant v. Ernest C. Roe, Warden,order

209 F.3d 1122, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 4205, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3105, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 7347, 2000 WL 432411

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 24, 2000·No. 97-17232·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Upon consideration of the opinion of the Supreme Court we vacate our opinion in Ortega v. Roe, 160 F.3d 534 (9th Cir.1998). This case is remanded to the district court for proceedings consistent with the-opinion in Ernest C. Roe, Warden v. Lucio Flores-Ortega, — U.S.-, 120 S.Ct. 1029, 145 L.Ed.2d 985 (2000).

The clerk is directed to issue the mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Upon consideration of the opinion of the Supreme Court we vacate our opinion in Ortega v. Roe, 160 F.3d 534 (9th Cir.1998). This case is remanded to the district court for proceedings consistent with the-opinion in Ernest C. Roe, Warden v. Lucio Flores-Ortega, — U.S.-, 120 S.Ct. 1029, 145 L.Ed.2d 985 (2000).

The clerk is directed to issue the mandate forthwith.

Lucio Flores Ortega,petitioner-Appellant v. Ernest C. Roe, Warden,order, 209 F.3d 1122, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 4205, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3105, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 7347, 2000 WL 432411 (9th Cir. 2000).

Pincite

209 F.3d 1122 (Lucio Flores Ortega,petitioner-Appellant v. Ernest C. Roe, Warden,order) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related