Lucille R. Kelley v. Land Rover Houston

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 6, 2005
Docket01-03-01056-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Lucille R. Kelley v. Land Rover Houston (Lucille R. Kelley v. Land Rover Houston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lucille R. Kelley v. Land Rover Houston, (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion



Opinion issued January 6, 2005.






In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas


NO. 01-03-01056-CV

 ___________

LUCILLE R. KELLEY, Appellant

V.

LAND ROVER HOUSTON, Appellee


On Appeal from County Civil Court at Law No. 2

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 785,396


MEMORANDUM OPINION

          Appellee, Land Rover Houston, filed a motion to dismiss the appeal filed by appellant, Lucille R. Kelley. The motion contends that this Court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal. We agree.

          For purposes of this appeal and the question of this Court’s jurisdiction, the facts are not complicated. The suit was initiated in Harris County small claims court. The final judgment rendered and signed by that court was appealed to the County Civil Court at Law No. 2 of Harris County. The county civil court at law entered its final judgment, and that judgment is now before us in this appeal.

          The right granted to appeal from a small claims court judgment is “[t]o the county court or county court at law,” Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 28.052(a) (Vernon 1988), the judgment of which “on the appeal is final.” Id. § 28.053(d) (Vernon 1988). The word “final” as used in section 28.053(d) needs no definition. It means that there is no further appeal beyond the county court or county court at law. Davis v. Covert, 983 S.W.2d 301, 302 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1998, pet. dism’d w.o.j.) Courts must take unambiguous statutes as they find them. St. Luke’s Episcopal Hosp. v. Agbor, 952 S.W.2d 503, 505 (Tex.1997).


Conclusion

          We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Any outstanding motions are denied as moot.


                                                                        George C. Hanks, Jr.

                                                                        Justice


Panel consists of Justices Nuchia, Hanks, and Higley.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davis v. Covert
983 S.W.2d 301 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1998)
St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital v. Agbor
952 S.W.2d 503 (Texas Supreme Court, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lucille R. Kelley v. Land Rover Houston, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lucille-r-kelley-v-land-rover-houston-texapp-2005.