Luciano v. Trabucco

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Luciano v. Trabucco

159 A.D.2d 695, 553 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3625

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 26, 1990

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 159 A.D.2d 695 (Luciano v. Trabucco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Luciano v. Trabucco, 159 A.D.2d 695, 553 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3625 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the nonparty firm of Gruber & Gruber, P. C. appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), entered July 6, 1988, which fixed the value of the legal services rendered by the plaintiff’s former attorneys, Boeggeman, George, Jannace & Hodges, P. C., at the sum of $4,904.82.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The record supports the Supreme Court’s determination that the plaintiff’s former attorneys are entitled to a charging lien in the sum of $4,904.82, which represents the reasonable value of the services rendered prior to the date of substitution of counsel (see, Lai Ling Cheng v Modansky Leasing Co., 73 NY2d 454; Matter of Montgomery, 272 NY 323; Matter of Shaad, 59 AD2d 1061). Brown, J. P., Eiber, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the nonparty firm of Gruber & Gruber, P. C. appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), entered July 6, 1988, which fixed the value of the legal services rendered by the plaintiff’s former attorneys, Boeggeman, George, Jannace & Hodges, P. C., at the sum of $4,904.82.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The record supports the Supreme Court’s determination that the plaintiff’s former attorneys are entitled to a charging lien in the sum of $4,904.82, which represents the reasonable value of the services rendered prior to the date of substitution of counsel (see, Lai Ling Cheng v Modansky Leasing Co., 73 NY2d 454; Matter of Montgomery, 272 NY 323; Matter of Shaad, 59 AD2d 1061). Brown, J. P., Eiber, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

159 A.D.2d 695, 553 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3625, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luciano-v-trabucco-nyappdiv-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack