Luciano v. Luciano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Luciano v. Luciano

161 A.D. 945, 146 N.Y.S. 1098

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1914·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

We are of opinion that the affidavit upon which the order in supplementary proceedings was based was sufficient. (See Jaques v. Willett, 104 N. Y. Supp. 500, and Sherl v. Kurzman, 60 Misc. Rep. 332.) The order appealed from is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the County Court of Westchester county for further proceeding. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Putnam, JJ., concurred. Order of the County Court of Westchester county reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and matter remitted to said court for further proceeding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

We are of opinion that the affidavit upon which the order in supplementary proceedings was based was sufficient. (See Jaques v. Willett, 104 N. Y. Supp. 500, and Sherl v. Kurzman, 60 Misc. Rep. 332.) The order appealed from is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the County Court of Westchester county for further proceeding. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Putnam, JJ., concurred. Order of the County Court of Westchester county reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and matter remitted to said court for further proceeding.

Luciano v. Luciano, 161 A.D. 945, 146 N.Y.S. 1098 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

161 A.D. 945 (Luciano v. Luciano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related