Luciano v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

503 A.2d 92, 94 Pa. Commw. 128, 1986 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1844
CourtCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 9, 1986
DocketAppeal, No. 1185 C.D. 1984
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 503 A.2d 92 (Luciano v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Luciano v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 503 A.2d 92, 94 Pa. Commw. 128, 1986 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1844 (Pa. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

Opinion by

President Judge Crumlish, Jr.,

A,referee’s decision denying Deborah K. Luciano benefits was upheld by the Unemployment Compensa[129]*129tion Board of Review. She appeals; we reverse the Boiard.

Luciano, a keypunch operator for Proctor Silex in Altoona, was laid off for lack ¡of work. She applied for and received benefits. The Office of Employment Security (OES) .twice offered to refer her to available full-time positions for keypunch operators in Altoona, the first time in December 1983 and the second time in January 1984. Both jobs paid a higher salary than Luciano’s prior employment. The referee found that she discouraged these referrals because she planned on attending nursing school fuU-tdme, commencing in August 1984.1 He concluded that this made Luciano ineligible for benefits under Section 402(a) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Act)2 for failing to apply for suitable work.

We agree with Luciano’s contention ‘that the Board erred in upholding the referee’s determination that .¡she was ineligible for benefits under Section 402(a).3

The record reveals that Luciano candidly informed ■the OES that ishe would only be available for temporary .employment through August 1984, when she intended to return to nursing school full-time.4 This limitation clearly discouraged the two referrals to permanent employment opportunities. It did not, however, amount to a refusal .of suitable work referrals, .since her plans precluded permanent employment.

[130]*130Accordingly, fee decision is reversed.

Order

The Unemployment 'Compensation Board <of Review .order, No. B-228873 dated March 30, 1984, is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shreiner v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
663 A.2d 264 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
503 A.2d 92, 94 Pa. Commw. 128, 1986 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luciano-v-commonwealth-unemployment-compensation-board-of-review-pacommwct-1986.