Luciani v. Martinez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Luciani v. Martinez

50 A.D.2d 837, 377 N.Y.S.2d 980, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11697

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 50 A.D.2d 837 (Luciani v. Martinez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Luciani v. Martinez, 50 A.D.2d 837, 377 N.Y.S.2d 980, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11697 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant Luciani appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered September 30, 1974, upon a jury verdict, against her and in favor of plaintiff, and against plaintiff as to defendant Martinez. Judgment affirmed, with one bill of costs jointly to respondents. In our opinion the evidence presented the jury, on the liability trial, with a question of credibility which it resolved in favor of defendant Martinez. Further, the trial court’s charge to the jury adequately presented the main contentions of the parties as applied to the pertinent provisions of law (cf. Green v Downs, 27 NY2d 205). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Latham, Margett, Christ and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant Luciani appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered September 30, 1974, upon a jury verdict, against her and in favor of plaintiff, and against plaintiff as to defendant Martinez. Judgment affirmed, with one bill of costs jointly to respondents. In our opinion the evidence presented the jury, on the liability trial, with a question of credibility which it resolved in favor of defendant Martinez. Further, the trial court’s charge to the jury adequately presented the main contentions of the parties as applied to the pertinent provisions of law (cf. Green v Downs, 27 NY2d 205). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Latham, Margett, Christ and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.2d 837, 377 N.Y.S.2d 980, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luciani-v-martinez-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack