Lucia Magana-Magana v. Eric Holder, Jr.

421 F. App'x 682
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 10, 2011
Docket09-70348
StatusUnpublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 421 F. App'x 682 (Lucia Magana-Magana v. Eric Holder, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lucia Magana-Magana v. Eric Holder, Jr., 421 F. App'x 682 (9th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Lucia Magana-Magana, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary determination that Ma-gana-Magana failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a qualifying relative. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 929-30 (9th Cir.2005). Magana-Magana’s contention that the BIA applied an incorrect hardship standard is not supported by the record and does not amount to a colorable legal or constitutional claim over which we have jurisdiction. See Mendez-Castro v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 975, 979-80 (9th Cir.2009).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Magana-Magana v. Bondi
Ninth Circuit, 2025
Magana-Magana v. Garland
129 F.4th 557 (Ninth Circuit, 2024)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
421 F. App'x 682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lucia-magana-magana-v-eric-holder-jr-ca9-2011.