Lucia Magana-Magana v. Eric Holder, Jr.

421 F. App'x 682
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 10, 2011·No. 09-70348·Unpublished·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Lucia Magana-Magana, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary determination that Ma-gana-Magana failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a qualifying relative. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 929-30 (9th Cir.2005). Magana-Magana’s contention that the BIA applied an incorrect hardship standard is not supported by the record and does not amount to a colorable legal or constitutional claim over which we have jurisdiction. See Mendez-Castro v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 975, 979-80 (9th Cir.2009).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lucia Magana-Magana v. Eric Holder, Jr., 421 F. App'x 682 (9th Cir. 2011).

421 F. App'x 682 (Lucia Magana-Magana v. Eric Holder, Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Magana-Magana v. Bondi
Ninth Circuit, 2025
Magana-Magana v. Garland
129 F.4th 557 (Ninth Circuit, 2024)