Luchina v. Berman

555 So. 2d 939, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 206, 1990 WL 2686
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 17, 1990
DocketNo. 88-2258
StatusPublished

This text of 555 So. 2d 939 (Luchina v. Berman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Luchina v. Berman, 555 So. 2d 939, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 206, 1990 WL 2686 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

REVERSED. We agree with appellant that the county court record reflects that the state failed to . establish sufficient grounds to extend the time within which appellant was entitled to be brought to trial under Rule 3.191(d)(2), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure (1987). See R.L.K. v. Hastings, 370 So.2d 1233 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979); Watts v. State, 516 So.2d 346 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).

ANSTEAD, WALDEN and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Interest of R.L.K. v. Hastings
370 So. 2d 1233 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Watts v. State
516 So. 2d 346 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
555 So. 2d 939, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 206, 1990 WL 2686, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luchina-v-berman-fladistctapp-1990.