Lucet v. Beekman

1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 428

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lucet v. Beekman. Read the opinion of the Court — 2 Cai. Cas. 385 →

New York Supreme Court·Decided February 15, 1805·Published

Opinion

IF a party named in a petition, for partition, be stated to be seised of a certain portion, the court will intend it to be of a fee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lucet v. Beekman, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 428 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1805).

Pincite

1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 428 (Lucet v. Beekman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.