Lucero v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Lucero v. State

502 S.W.2d 128

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedDecember 12, 1973

DocketNo. 47806

StatusPublished

This text of 502 S.W.2d 128 (Lucero v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lucero v. State, 502 S.W.2d 128 (Tex. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

ONION, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction for robbery by assault wherein the punishment was assessed at twenty (20) years following a plea of guilty before the court.

At the outset we are met with appellant’s contention that the indictment is fatally defective since it does not allege other than by inference to whom the property allegedly taken belonged.

An examination of the instant indictment reveals that it does not allege to whom the property allegedly taken belonged.

“An indictment for robbery is bad if it is not alleged other than by inference to whom the property taken belonged. Besides the allegation that the property was fraudulently taken from the person or possession of another it is necessary to allege in some way the ownership of the property.” 5 Branch’s Ann.P.C., 2d ed., Sec. 2584, p. 19. See also Barnes v. State, 9 Tex.App. 128 (1880); Higgins v. State, 19 S.W. 503 (Tex.Cr.App.1892); Barfield v. State, 137 Tex.Cr.R. 256, 129 S.W.2d 310 (1939); Bailey v. State, 139 Tex.Cr.R. 260, 139 S.W.2d 599 (1940); Snow v. State, 156 Tex.Cr.R. 49, 238 S.W.2d 966 (1951) ; 50 Tex.Jur.2d, Robbery, Sec. 25, p. 180.

The State in its appellate brief filed in the trial court has confessed error and agrees that this conviction must be reversed.

We are in accord.

The judgment is reversed and cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

ONION, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction for robbery by assault wherein the punishment was assessed at twenty (20) years following a plea of guilty before the court.

At the outset we are met with appellant’s contention that the indictment is fatally defective since it does not allege other than by inference to whom the property allegedly taken belonged.

An examination of the instant indictment reveals that it does not allege to whom the property allegedly taken belonged.

“An indictment for robbery is bad if it is not alleged other than by inference to whom the property taken belonged. Besides the allegation that the property was fraudulently taken from the person or possession of another it is necessary to allege in some way the ownership of the property.” 5 Branch’s Ann.P.C., 2d ed., Sec. 2584, p. 19. See also Barnes v. State, 9 Tex.App. 128 (1880); Higgins v. State, 19 S.W. 503 (Tex.Cr.App.1892); Barfield v. State, 137 Tex.Cr.R. 256, 129 S.W.2d 310 (1939); Bailey v. State, 139 Tex.Cr.R. 260, 139 S.W.2d 599 (1940); Snow v. State, 156 Tex.Cr.R. 49, 238 S.W.2d 966 (1951) ; 50 Tex.Jur.2d, Robbery, Sec. 25, p. 180.

The State in its appellate brief filed in the trial court has confessed error and agrees that this conviction must be reversed.

We are in accord.

The judgment is reversed and cause remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

502 S.W.2d 128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lucero-v-state-texcrimapp-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack