Lucero v. Lucero

Opinion

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 KATHERINE LUCERO and 3 PATRICIA BAINES,

4 Petitioners-Appellees,

5 v. NO. 31,375

6 JASON LUCERO and DEBRA WILHITE,

7 Interested Party

8 and

9 MICHAEL MANG,

10 Intervenor-Appellant.

11 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY 12 Gerard J. LaVelle, District Judge

13 Katherine A. Lucero 14 Ruidoso, NM

15 Patricia Ann Baines 16 Albuquerque, NM

17 Pro Se

18 Jason Lucero 19 Albuquerque, NM 1 Michael S. Mang 2 Albuquerque, NM

3 Debra Wilhite 4 Albuquerque, NM

5 Pro Se

6 Charlotte Mary Toulouse 7 Albuquerque, NM

8 Guardian ad Litem

9 MEMORANDUM OPINION

10 FRY, Judge.

11 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the calendar notice.

12 No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing

13 so has expired. AFFIRMED.

14 IT IS SO ORDERED.

15 16 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge 17 WE CONCUR:

18 19 CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Chief Judge

2 1 2 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge