Lucerne International Inc v. Dura Automotive Systems LLC
This text of Lucerne International Inc v. Dura Automotive Systems LLC (Lucerne International Inc v. Dura Automotive Systems LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
February 13, 2019 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem 159005 & (16) Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra LUCERNE INTERNATIONAL, INC., Richard H. Bernstein Plaintiff-Appellee, Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices v SC: 159005 COA: 346996 Wayne CC: 18-015030-CB DURA AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS, LLC, and MILAN METAL SYSTEMS, LLC, Defendants-Appellants, and ASIA FORGING SUPPLY CO., LTD, and FAW FORGING AND CASTING USA, INC., Defendants. _________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the December 28, 2018 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. February 13, 2019 d0212 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lucerne International Inc v. Dura Automotive Systems LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lucerne-international-inc-v-dura-automotive-systems-llc-mich-2019.