Lucente v. Riverbay Corp.
45 A.D.3d 365, 844 N.Y.S.2d 701
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lucente v. Riverbay Corp.. Read the opinion of the Court — 58 A.D.3d 451 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 13, 2007·Published
Opinion
Appeal, as limited by the briefs, from that part of the order of Supreme Court, Bronx County (Sallie ManzanetDaniels, J.), entered on or about December 1, 2006, which denied defendants’ motion to consolidate this action with another pending in Bronx County, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as moot.
[366]*366This court dismissed Viera v Riverbay Corp. (44 AD3d 577 [1st Dept 2007]), the action with which defendants seek consolidation. Concur—Saxe, J.P., Marlow, Buckley, Catterson and McGuire, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lucente v. Riverbay Corp., 45 A.D.3d 365, 844 N.Y.S.2d 701 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).
45 A.D.3d 365 (Lucente v. Riverbay Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Viera v. Riverbay Corp.
44 A.D.3d 577 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)