Luce v. McGovern, No. Cv 92 0051188 S (May 4, 1993)

1993 Conn. Super. Ct. 4356
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided May 4, 1993·No. No. CV 92 0051188 S·Unpublished

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE #118 CT Page 4357 The plaintiff, Jeanette Luce, moves to strike the defendant's first special defense which alleges collateral source payments.

Although there is a split of authority in the state superior courts as to whether a defendant may validly plead collateral source payments as a special defense, the Court is persuaded by the weight of authority which disallows such a defense, and arguments cited in those cases, and therefore, grants the plaintiff's motion to strike.

See Jeffreys v. Bombassei, 8 CSCR 261 (March 15, 1993, Jones, J.); Kelly v. Reynolds, 8 CSCR 129 (January 5, 1993, Lehaney, J.); Darling v. Peerless Ins. Co., 7 CSCR 1328 (December 14, 1992, Teller, J.); Patel v. W. F. Painting, 7 CSCR 136 (January 27, 1992, Mihalakos, J.).

BY THE COURT,

William M. Shaughnessy Judge, Superior Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luce v. McGovern, No. Cv 92 0051188 S (May 4, 1993), 1993 Conn. Super. Ct. 4356 (Colo. Ct. App. 1993).

1993 Conn. Super. Ct. 4356 (Luce v. McGovern, No. Cv 92 0051188 S (May 4, 1993)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Darling v. Peerless Insurance Company, No. 05 21 19 (Oct. 23, 1992)
1992 Conn. Super. Ct. 11089 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1992)
Kelly v. Reynolds, No. Cv 89-0260636 (Jan. 5, 1993)
1993 Conn. Super. Ct. 728 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1993)