Luce v. Hartman
159 N.E.2d 677, 6 N.Y.2d 786
Opinion
Judgment of the Appellate Division reversed and that of Trial Term reinstated, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division, upon the ground that facts were submitted as to negli[788] gence and proximate cause justifying submission of the case to the jury. No opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Conway and Judges Desmond, Fuld and Feoessel. Judges Dye, Van Voobhis and Btjbke dissent and vote to affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Luce v. Hartman, 159 N.E.2d 677, 6 N.Y.2d 786 (N.Y. 1959).
159 N.E.2d 677 (Luce v. Hartman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bell v. Board of Education
230 A.D.2d 610 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Betancourt v. Manhattan Ford Lincoln Mercury, Inc.
195 A.D.2d 246 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Rotz v. City of New York
143 A.D.2d 301 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Snyder v. Kramer
94 A.D.2d 860 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Gill v. Falkowski
69 A.D.2d 934 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
Mace v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.
55 A.D.2d 432 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)