Home/New York Court of Appeals/Luce v. Hartman

Luce v. Hartman

159 N.E.2d 677, 6 N.Y.2d 786
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 14, 1959
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 159 N.E.2d 677 (Luce v. Hartman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Luce v. Hartman, 159 N.E.2d 677, 6 N.Y.2d 786 (N.Y. 1959).

Opinion

Judgment of the Appellate Division reversed and that of Trial Term reinstated, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division, upon the ground that facts were submitted as to negli[788]*788gence and proximate cause justifying submission of the case to the jury. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Conway and Judges Desmond, Fuld and Feoessel. Judges Dye, Van Voobhis and Btjbke dissent and vote to affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bell v. Board of Education
230 A.D.2d 610 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Betancourt v. Manhattan Ford Lincoln Mercury, Inc.
195 A.D.2d 246 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Rotz v. City of New York
143 A.D.2d 301 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Snyder v. Kramer
94 A.D.2d 860 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Gill v. Falkowski
69 A.D.2d 934 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
Mace v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.
55 A.D.2d 432 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
159 N.E.2d 677, 6 N.Y.2d 786, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luce-v-hartman-ny-1959.