Luce & Co. v. Registrar of Guayama

34 P.R. 578
Supreme Court of Puerto Rico·Decided July 24, 1925·No. No. 594·Published

Opinions

ORDER.

"Whereas, An appeal has been interposed to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit from the judgment -of the Supreme Court of Porto Rico in this case;

Whereas, The question of whether or not an appeal lies fir'om the said judgment has been discussed fully by this court after hearing the appellant and the registrar, Justices Wolf and Aldrey being of the opinion that it does not lie and that therefore • the appeal should be denied and Chief Justice Pel Toro and Justices Hutchison and Franco Soto thinking that as it is a new question involving the jurisdiction of the Circuit Court it should be left to the decision of that court, albeit its decision is not absolutely urgent, and Justices Hutchison and Franco Soto also having some doubts about whether or not the judgment is appealable, while on this point Chief Justice Del Toro agrees with the minority;

Thekeeore, The court allows the appeal taken by Luce & Co., Ltd., to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit of the United States from the judgment of this court of February 20, 1925," in the above-entitled case and fixes [579] at $300 tlie security to be given by the appellant to respond for the costs that the said appeal may cause the adverso party, allowing the said appellant a period of sixty days for preparing and translating the transcript of the record that must be sent up to the said Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit of the- United States.

It is so ordered by the court, Justices Wolf and Aldrey dissenting from the allowance of the appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luce & Co. v. Registrar of Guayama, 34 P.R. 578 (prsupreme 1925).

34 P.R. 578 (Luce & Co. v. Registrar of Guayama) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chisholm v. Georgia
2 U.S. 419 (Supreme Court, 1793)
Marbury v. Madison
5 U.S. 137 (Supreme Court, 1803)
Cohens v. Virginia
19 U.S. 264 (Supreme Court, 1821)
Osborn v. Bank of United States
22 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1824)
Robertson v. Baldwin
165 U.S. 275 (Supreme Court, 1897)
Pacific Steam Whaling Co. v. United States
187 U.S. 447 (Supreme Court, 1903)
Muskrat v. United States
219 U.S. 346 (Supreme Court, 1911)
Campbell v. United States
224 U.S. 99 (Supreme Court, 1912)
Mohave County v. Stephens
149 P. 670 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1915)
State v. Lindley
83 N.W. 257 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1900)
Douglas v. Hutchinson
55 N.E. 628 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1899)
Whitney v. Hall
47 N.W. 27 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1890)
Renaud v. State Court of Mediation & Arbitration
51 L.R.A. 458 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1900)
Barnett v. Pemiscot County Court
86 S.W. 575 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1905)
United States v. Dolla
177 F. 101 (Fifth Circuit, 1910)
United States v. Lenore
207 F. 865 (D. North Dakota, 1913)