Luce & Co. v. Registrar of Guayama

Supreme Court of Puerto Rico

Luce & Co. v. Registrar of Guayama

34 P.R. 578

CourtSupreme Court of Puerto Rico

DecidedJuly 24, 1925

DocketNo. 594

StatusPublished

This text of 34 P.R. 578 (Luce & Co. v. Registrar of Guayama) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Puerto Rico primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Luce & Co. v. Registrar of Guayama, 34 P.R. 578 (prsupreme 1925).

Pincite

Opinions

ORDER.

"Whereas, An appeal has been interposed to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit from the judgment -of the Supreme Court of Porto Rico in this case;

Whereas, The question of whether or not an appeal lies fir'om the said judgment has been discussed fully by this court after hearing the appellant and the registrar, Justices Wolf and Aldrey being of the opinion that it does not lie and that therefore • the appeal should be denied and Chief Justice Pel Toro and Justices Hutchison and Franco Soto thinking that as it is a new question involving the jurisdiction of the Circuit Court it should be left to the decision of that court, albeit its decision is not absolutely urgent, and Justices Hutchison and Franco Soto also having some doubts about whether or not the judgment is appealable, while on this point Chief Justice Del Toro agrees with the minority;

Thekeeore, The court allows the appeal taken by Luce & Co., Ltd., to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit of the United States from the judgment of this court of February 20, 1925," in the above-entitled case and fixes [579]*579at $300 tlie security to be given by the appellant to respond for the costs that the said appeal may cause the adverso party, allowing the said appellant a period of sixty days for preparing and translating the transcript of the record that must be sent up to the said Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit of the- United States.

It is so ordered by the court, Justices Wolf and Aldrey dissenting from the allowance of the appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER.

"Whereas, An appeal has been interposed to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit from the judgment -of the Supreme Court of Porto Rico in this case;

Whereas, The question of whether or not an appeal lies fir'om the said judgment has been discussed fully by this court after hearing the appellant and the registrar, Justices Wolf and Aldrey being of the opinion that it does not lie and that therefore • the appeal should be denied and Chief Justice Pel Toro and Justices Hutchison and Franco Soto thinking that as it is a new question involving the jurisdiction of the Circuit Court it should be left to the decision of that court, albeit its decision is not absolutely urgent, and Justices Hutchison and Franco Soto also having some doubts about whether or not the judgment is appealable, while on this point Chief Justice Del Toro agrees with the minority;

Thekeeore, The court allows the appeal taken by Luce & Co., Ltd., to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit of the United States from the judgment of this court of February 20, 1925," in the above-entitled case and fixes [579]*579at $300 tlie security to be given by the appellant to respond for the costs that the said appeal may cause the adverso party, allowing the said appellant a period of sixty days for preparing and translating the transcript of the record that must be sent up to the said Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit of the- United States.

It is so ordered by the court, Justices Wolf and Aldrey dissenting from the allowance of the appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 P.R. 578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luce-co-v-registrar-of-guayama-prsupreme-1925.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack