Lucci v. Schwartz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lucci v. Schwartz

56 A.D.2d 885, 392 N.Y.S.2d 389, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11268

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 21, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 56 A.D.2d 885 (Lucci v. Schwartz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lucci v. Schwartz, 56 A.D.2d 885, 392 N.Y.S.2d 389, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11268 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In consolidated actions for various forms of equitable relief, Frank Lucinski, plaintiff in Action No. 2, appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated August 1, 1975, as, after a nonjury trial, held that he and the two other individual parties to these actions were each entitled to one third of the stock of the defendant corporations and directed an accounting of the corporate funds. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs payable jointly to respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs, on the opinion of Mr. Justice Lipetz at Special Term. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Rabin, Suozzi and Mollen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In consolidated actions for various forms of equitable relief, Frank Lucinski, plaintiff in Action No. 2, appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated August 1, 1975, as, after a nonjury trial, held that he and the two other individual parties to these actions were each entitled to one third of the stock of the defendant corporations and directed an accounting of the corporate funds. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs payable jointly to respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs, on the opinion of Mr. Justice Lipetz at Special Term. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Rabin, Suozzi and Mollen, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 A.D.2d 885, 392 N.Y.S.2d 389, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lucci-v-schwartz-nyappdiv-1977.