Lucchese v. Agro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lucchese v. Agro

103 A.D.2d 842, 478 N.Y.S.2d 75, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19486

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 30, 1984·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

— In an action to enforce two oral agreements, plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Orgera, J.), dated September 22, 1983, as, upon granting reargument, adhered to its original determination which dismissed the complaint. H Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. H The oral agreements sought to be enforced here could not be performed within the lifetime of the parties’ mother and are therefore unenforceable under the Statute of Frauds (see General Obligations Law, § 5-701, subd a, par 1; Meltzer v Koenigsberg, 302 NY 523). Lazer, J. P., Mangano, O’Connor, and Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action to enforce two oral agreements, plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Orgera, J.), dated September 22, 1983, as, upon granting reargument, adhered to its original determination which dismissed the complaint. H Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. H The oral agreements sought to be enforced here could not be performed within the lifetime of the parties’ mother and are therefore unenforceable under the Statute of Frauds (see General Obligations Law, § 5-701, subd a, par 1; Meltzer v Koenigsberg, 302 NY 523). Lazer, J. P., Mangano, O’Connor, and Brown, JJ., concur.

Lucchese v. Agro, 103 A.D.2d 842, 478 N.Y.S.2d 75, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19486 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

103 A.D.2d 842 (Lucchese v. Agro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related