Hill, Justice.
The petitioner in this quo warranto action contends that Heyward Woodward, the respondent, should be removed from the office of county commissioner of Rockdale County because he had not resided in that county for five years prior to his election on November 2, 1976, as would be required by the 1941 local act establishing the office.
The trial court overruled Woodward’s motion to dismiss which challenged the statute on constitutional grounds, but after a hearing on June 17, 1977, the trial court denied quo warranto. Both parties have appealed.
The Georgia Constitution provides that no person shall be a "county officer” unless he shall have been a resident of the county for two years.
We must decide whether a county commissioner is a county officer within the meaning of this constitutional provision, and if so, whether the General Assembly may impose a longer residency requirement than is fixed by our Constitution.
1. Are county commissioners county officers within the meaning of the Constitution? Code Ann. § 2-5808. The conflict in Georgia authority on this issue has been previously noted.
Smith v. Abercrombie,
235 Ga. 741, 747 (221 SE2d 802) (1975); R. Sentell, Studies in Georgia Local Government Law, pp. 199-219 (1977), and 15 Mercer L. Rev. 258, 265-266 (1963).
Several decisions hold that the county commissioners are county officers within the meaning of the constitutional provision. County commissioners were found to be such county officers in
Hulgan v. Thornton,
205 Ga. 753, 756 (55 SE2d 115) (1949), which affirmed the ruling that the person elected to the office of county commissioner was not qualified at the time of his election because he was not a qualified voter as required.
In Sweat v. Barnhill,
171 Ga. 294 (9) (155 SE 18) (1930), the court reversed the dismissal of a petition in quo warranto holding that the legislature could not by special Act appoint a person to the office of county commissioner in disregard of the constitutional requirement that county officers be elected by the qualified voters of their respective counties or districts.
See also
Lance v. Stepp,
232 Ga. 675 (208 SE2d 559) (1974).
Malone v. Minchew,
170 Ga. 687 (2) (153 SE 773) (1930), had reached the same result, finding that the legislature could not ignore a general statute
which repeated the constitutional
requirement that a county officer must be a qualified voter.
McCranie v. Minchew,
170 Ga. 691 (154 SE 776), and
Davis v. Minchew,
170 Ga. 691 (154 SE 189) (1930), followed
Malone,
supra.
The case of
Marshall v. Walker,
183 Ga. 44 (1) (187 SE 81) (1936), should not be read to indicate that county commissioners are not county officers.
Marshall
found that qualifications for the office of county school superintendent were not limited by Code Ann. § 2-5808. The
Marshall
court held that Code Ann. § 2-5808 applied only to those county offices which were in existence at the time of adoption of the 1877 Constitution, which was still in force in 1936 when
Marshall
was decided.
Marshall
cautioned that insofar as
Sweat v. Barnhill,
supra, did not comport with this rule, that case was not followed in
Marshall.
The office of county commissioner was in existence both in 1877, see
Waller v. Perkins,
52 Ga. 233 (5) (1873);
Churchill v. Walker,
68 Ga. 681 (6) (1882), and in 1945, when the pertinent provisions of the 1877 Constitution were reenacted in substantially their same form in the 1945 Constitution. Therefore, the caveat as to county school superintendents does not reduce the force of
Sweat v. Barnhill,
supra, as to county commissioners.
On the other hand,
Rhodes v. Jernigan, 155
Ga. 523 (2) (117 SE 432) (1923), held that the office of county
commissioner was not a county office. The
Rhodes
court would not conform that office to the 1914 constitutional amendment which increased the term of office of county officers to four years.
That part of the holding in
Rhodes
is in direct conflict with the weight of the subsequent decisions of this court and will no longer be followed.
Parks v. Ash,
168 Ga. 868 (5) (149 SE 207) (1929), which considered county commissioners to be "creatures of statutes,” and
Wilson v. Harris,
170 Ga. 800 (2, 3) (154 SE 388) (1930), which relied in part on the disapproved holding of
Rhodes v. Jernigan,
supra, will not be followed insofar as they would remove the office of county commissioner from the operation of the constitutional provision regarding county officers.
We are not unmindful of those provisions of the Constitution which allow the General Assembly much
authority to establish the duties, powers and jurisdiction of and the remedies against county commissioners.
"[These provisions] in regard to creation of county commissioners and defining their duties [were] not intended, however, to authorize the legislature to violate every other provision in the constitution under the name of defining the duties of the county commissioners . . .”
Board of Commrs. of Sumter County v. Mayor &c. of Americus,
supra. These two provisions do not clearly except county commissioners from the constitutional provisions of Code Ann. § 2-5808 regarding county officers. "The different provisions of the constitution are to be construed as in harmony with one another rather than as contradictory.”
Board of Commrs. of Sumter County,
supra, at 544. We hold that the office of county commissioner is a county office governed by the constitutional provisions of what is now the Constitution of 1976 (Art. IX, Sec. I, Par. VIII; Code Ann. § 2-5808).
2. May the General Assembly impose a residency requirement as a condition of eligibility to an office of county commissioner longer than the requirement fixed by the Constitution that a county officer ". . . shall have been a resident of the county for two years”? Code Ann. § 2-5808. In
White v. Clements,
39 Ga. 232, 265 (1869), the
court wrote that . . if the Constitution prescribes a qualification for an officer, it by necessary implication denies to the Legislature the power to fix new and other qualifications.” Where the Constitution has prescribed the qualifications which allow and prevent eligibility to a public office, the General Assembly cannot by statute add to or take from those conditions of eligibility. See
Ray v. Hand,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hill, Justice.
The petitioner in this quo warranto action contends that Heyward Woodward, the respondent, should be removed from the office of county commissioner of Rockdale County because he had not resided in that county for five years prior to his election on November 2, 1976, as would be required by the 1941 local act establishing the office.
The trial court overruled Woodward’s motion to dismiss which challenged the statute on constitutional grounds, but after a hearing on June 17, 1977, the trial court denied quo warranto. Both parties have appealed.
The Georgia Constitution provides that no person shall be a "county officer” unless he shall have been a resident of the county for two years.
We must decide whether a county commissioner is a county officer within the meaning of this constitutional provision, and if so, whether the General Assembly may impose a longer residency requirement than is fixed by our Constitution.
1. Are county commissioners county officers within the meaning of the Constitution? Code Ann. § 2-5808. The conflict in Georgia authority on this issue has been previously noted.
Smith v. Abercrombie,
235 Ga. 741, 747 (221 SE2d 802) (1975); R. Sentell, Studies in Georgia Local Government Law, pp. 199-219 (1977), and 15 Mercer L. Rev. 258, 265-266 (1963).
Several decisions hold that the county commissioners are county officers within the meaning of the constitutional provision. County commissioners were found to be such county officers in
Hulgan v. Thornton,
205 Ga. 753, 756 (55 SE2d 115) (1949), which affirmed the ruling that the person elected to the office of county commissioner was not qualified at the time of his election because he was not a qualified voter as required.
In Sweat v. Barnhill,
171 Ga. 294 (9) (155 SE 18) (1930), the court reversed the dismissal of a petition in quo warranto holding that the legislature could not by special Act appoint a person to the office of county commissioner in disregard of the constitutional requirement that county officers be elected by the qualified voters of their respective counties or districts.
See also
Lance v. Stepp,
232 Ga. 675 (208 SE2d 559) (1974).
Malone v. Minchew,
170 Ga. 687 (2) (153 SE 773) (1930), had reached the same result, finding that the legislature could not ignore a general statute
which repeated the constitutional
requirement that a county officer must be a qualified voter.
McCranie v. Minchew,
170 Ga. 691 (154 SE 776), and
Davis v. Minchew,
170 Ga. 691 (154 SE 189) (1930), followed
Malone,
supra.
The case of
Marshall v. Walker,
183 Ga. 44 (1) (187 SE 81) (1936), should not be read to indicate that county commissioners are not county officers.
Marshall
found that qualifications for the office of county school superintendent were not limited by Code Ann. § 2-5808. The
Marshall
court held that Code Ann. § 2-5808 applied only to those county offices which were in existence at the time of adoption of the 1877 Constitution, which was still in force in 1936 when
Marshall
was decided.
Marshall
cautioned that insofar as
Sweat v. Barnhill,
supra, did not comport with this rule, that case was not followed in
Marshall.
The office of county commissioner was in existence both in 1877, see
Waller v. Perkins,
52 Ga. 233 (5) (1873);
Churchill v. Walker,
68 Ga. 681 (6) (1882), and in 1945, when the pertinent provisions of the 1877 Constitution were reenacted in substantially their same form in the 1945 Constitution. Therefore, the caveat as to county school superintendents does not reduce the force of
Sweat v. Barnhill,
supra, as to county commissioners.
On the other hand,
Rhodes v. Jernigan, 155
Ga. 523 (2) (117 SE 432) (1923), held that the office of county
commissioner was not a county office. The
Rhodes
court would not conform that office to the 1914 constitutional amendment which increased the term of office of county officers to four years.
That part of the holding in
Rhodes
is in direct conflict with the weight of the subsequent decisions of this court and will no longer be followed.
Parks v. Ash,
168 Ga. 868 (5) (149 SE 207) (1929), which considered county commissioners to be "creatures of statutes,” and
Wilson v. Harris,
170 Ga. 800 (2, 3) (154 SE 388) (1930), which relied in part on the disapproved holding of
Rhodes v. Jernigan,
supra, will not be followed insofar as they would remove the office of county commissioner from the operation of the constitutional provision regarding county officers.
We are not unmindful of those provisions of the Constitution which allow the General Assembly much
authority to establish the duties, powers and jurisdiction of and the remedies against county commissioners.
"[These provisions] in regard to creation of county commissioners and defining their duties [were] not intended, however, to authorize the legislature to violate every other provision in the constitution under the name of defining the duties of the county commissioners . . .”
Board of Commrs. of Sumter County v. Mayor &c. of Americus,
supra. These two provisions do not clearly except county commissioners from the constitutional provisions of Code Ann. § 2-5808 regarding county officers. "The different provisions of the constitution are to be construed as in harmony with one another rather than as contradictory.”
Board of Commrs. of Sumter County,
supra, at 544. We hold that the office of county commissioner is a county office governed by the constitutional provisions of what is now the Constitution of 1976 (Art. IX, Sec. I, Par. VIII; Code Ann. § 2-5808).
2. May the General Assembly impose a residency requirement as a condition of eligibility to an office of county commissioner longer than the requirement fixed by the Constitution that a county officer ". . . shall have been a resident of the county for two years”? Code Ann. § 2-5808. In
White v. Clements,
39 Ga. 232, 265 (1869), the
court wrote that . . if the Constitution prescribes a qualification for an officer, it by necessary implication denies to the Legislature the power to fix new and other qualifications.” Where the Constitution has prescribed the qualifications which allow and prevent eligibility to a public office, the General Assembly cannot by statute add to or take from those conditions of eligibility. See
Ray v. Hand,
225 Ga. 589, 591 (170 SE2d 692) (1969). "It is quite generally considered that where the constitution lays down specific eligibility requirements for a particular constitutional office, the constitutional specification in that regard is exclusive and the legislature (except where expressly authorized to do so) has no power to require additional or different qualifications for such constitutional office.” Annot. 34 ALR2d 155, 171, § 6 (1954).
Argued October 12, 1977
Decided February 22, 1978.
■
Bryan, Wilgus & Spell, L. Penn Spell, Jr.,
for appellant.
Swertfeger & Scott, Thomas L. Scott, Curtis R. Richardson, Jack H. Thrasher, L. Jack Swertfeger,
for appellee.
We find that the condition in Ga. Laws 1941, pp. 952 to 954, supra, which requires five years residence for eligibility to the office of county commissioners is invalid because the Constitution requires that a county officer shall have been a resident of the county for two years. Therefore the judgment denying quo warranto is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.