Lucas v. Woodward

243 S.E.2d 28, 240 Ga. 770, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 825
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 22, 1978
Docket32837, 32838
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 243 S.E.2d 28 (Lucas v. Woodward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lucas v. Woodward, 243 S.E.2d 28, 240 Ga. 770, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 825 (Ga. 1978).

Opinion

Hill, Justice.

The petitioner in this quo warranto action contends that Heyward Woodward, the respondent, should be removed from the office of county commissioner of Rockdale County because he had not resided in that county for five years prior to his election on November 2, 1976, as would be required by the 1941 local act establishing the office. 1 The trial court overruled Woodward’s motion to dismiss which challenged the statute on constitutional grounds, but after a hearing on June 17, 1977, the trial court denied quo warranto. Both parties have appealed.

The Georgia Constitution provides that no person shall be a "county officer” unless he shall have been a resident of the county for two years. 2 We must decide whether a county commissioner is a county officer within the meaning of this constitutional provision, and if so, whether the General Assembly may impose a longer residency requirement than is fixed by our Constitution.

*771 1. Are county commissioners county officers within the meaning of the Constitution? Code Ann. § 2-5808. The conflict in Georgia authority on this issue has been previously noted. Smith v. Abercrombie, 235 Ga. 741, 747 (221 SE2d 802) (1975); R. Sentell, Studies in Georgia Local Government Law, pp. 199-219 (1977), and 15 Mercer L. Rev. 258, 265-266 (1963).

Several decisions hold that the county commissioners are county officers within the meaning of the constitutional provision. County commissioners were found to be such county officers in Hulgan v. Thornton, 205 Ga. 753, 756 (55 SE2d 115) (1949), which affirmed the ruling that the person elected to the office of county commissioner was not qualified at the time of his election because he was not a qualified voter as required. In Sweat v. Barnhill, 171 Ga. 294 (9) (155 SE 18) (1930), the court reversed the dismissal of a petition in quo warranto holding that the legislature could not by special Act appoint a person to the office of county commissioner in disregard of the constitutional requirement that county officers be elected by the qualified voters of their respective counties or districts. 3 See also Lance v. Stepp, 232 Ga. 675 (208 SE2d 559) (1974). Malone v. Minchew, 170 Ga. 687 (2) (153 SE 773) (1930), had reached the same result, finding that the legislature could not ignore a general statute 4 which repeated the constitutional *772 requirement that a county officer must be a qualified voter. McCranie v. Minchew, 170 Ga. 691 (154 SE 776), and Davis v. Minchew, 170 Ga. 691 (154 SE 189) (1930), followed Malone, supra. 5

The case of Marshall v. Walker, 183 Ga. 44 (1) (187 SE 81) (1936), should not be read to indicate that county commissioners are not county officers. Marshall found that qualifications for the office of county school superintendent were not limited by Code Ann. § 2-5808. The Marshall court held that Code Ann. § 2-5808 applied only to those county offices which were in existence at the time of adoption of the 1877 Constitution, which was still in force in 1936 when Marshall was decided. Marshall cautioned that insofar as Sweat v. Barnhill, supra, did not comport with this rule, that case was not followed in Marshall. The office of county commissioner was in existence both in 1877, see Waller v. Perkins, 52 Ga. 233 (5) (1873); Churchill v. Walker, 68 Ga. 681 (6) (1882), and in 1945, when the pertinent provisions of the 1877 Constitution were reenacted in substantially their same form in the 1945 Constitution. Therefore, the caveat as to county school superintendents does not reduce the force of Sweat v. Barnhill, supra, as to county commissioners.

On the other hand, Rhodes v. Jernigan, 155 Ga. 523 (2) (117 SE 432) (1923), held that the office of county *773 commissioner was not a county office. The Rhodes court would not conform that office to the 1914 constitutional amendment which increased the term of office of county officers to four years. 6 That part of the holding in Rhodes is in direct conflict with the weight of the subsequent decisions of this court and will no longer be followed. Parks v. Ash, 168 Ga. 868 (5) (149 SE 207) (1929), which considered county commissioners to be "creatures of statutes,” and Wilson v. Harris, 170 Ga. 800 (2, 3) (154 SE 388) (1930), which relied in part on the disapproved holding of Rhodes v. Jernigan, supra, will not be followed insofar as they would remove the office of county commissioner from the operation of the constitutional provision regarding county officers. 7

We are not unmindful of those provisions of the Constitution which allow the General Assembly much *774 authority to establish the duties, powers and jurisdiction of and the remedies against county commissioners. 8 "[These provisions] in regard to creation of county commissioners and defining their duties [were] not intended, however, to authorize the legislature to violate every other provision in the constitution under the name of defining the duties of the county commissioners . . .” Board of Commrs. of Sumter County v. Mayor &c. of Americus, supra. These two provisions do not clearly except county commissioners from the constitutional provisions of Code Ann. § 2-5808 regarding county officers. "The different provisions of the constitution are to be construed as in harmony with one another rather than as contradictory.” Board of Commrs. of Sumter County, supra, at 544. We hold that the office of county commissioner is a county office governed by the constitutional provisions of what is now the Constitution of 1976 (Art. IX, Sec. I, Par. VIII; Code Ann. § 2-5808).

2. May the General Assembly impose a residency requirement as a condition of eligibility to an office of county commissioner longer than the requirement fixed by the Constitution that a county officer ". . . shall have been a resident of the county for two years”? Code Ann. § 2-5808. In White v. Clements, 39 Ga. 232, 265 (1869), the *775 court wrote that . . if the Constitution prescribes a qualification for an officer, it by necessary implication denies to the Legislature the power to fix new and other qualifications.” Where the Constitution has prescribed the qualifications which allow and prevent eligibility to a public office, the General Assembly cannot by statute add to or take from those conditions of eligibility. See Ray v. Hand,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

BARROW v. RAFFENSPERGER (Two Cases)
308 Ga. 660 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2020)
DeKalb County School District v. Georgia State Board of Education
751 S.E.2d 827 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2013)
Horton v. Johnson
699 S.E.2d 314 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2010)
Perdue v. Palmour
600 S.E.2d 370 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2004)
Grech v. Clayton County, GA
335 F.3d 1326 (Eleventh Circuit, 2003)
Taylor v. Bartow County, Ga.
860 F. Supp. 1526 (N.D. Georgia, 1994)
Eaves v. Harris
364 S.E.2d 854 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1988)
White v. Manchin
318 S.E.2d 470 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1984)
Beauchamp v. Smith
295 S.E.2d 97 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1982)
Griggers v. Moye
272 S.E.2d 262 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1980)
Whitmer v. Thurman
247 S.E.2d 104 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
243 S.E.2d 28, 240 Ga. 770, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 825, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lucas-v-woodward-ga-1978.