Lucas v. Townsend

943 F.2d 38, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 21523, 1991 WL 177752
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedSeptember 12, 1991
DocketNo. 89-8556
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 943 F.2d 38 (Lucas v. Townsend) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lucas v. Townsend, 943 F.2d 38, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 21523, 1991 WL 177752 (11th Cir. 1991).

Opinion

ON REMAND PROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before HATCHETT, Circuit Judge, RONEY * and FAIRCHILD **, Senior Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

In its recent opinion in this case (Board of Public Education and Orphanage for Bibb County, et al. v. Lucas, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2845, 115 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1991)), the Supreme Court of the United States stated:

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for the clarification of the jurisdiction issue presented by the Solicitor General in his brief for the United States, as amicus curiae, filed June 4, 1991.

The jurisdiction issue the Supreme Court refers to is presented in our opinion Lucas v. Townsend, 908 F.2d 851, 858 (11th Cir.1990), footnote 7. On remand, if the district court finds that the constitutional claims were waived, appellate jurisdiction in this court is proper because no claims will remain outstanding in the district court. On the other hand, if the district court finds that the constitutional claims have not been waived, it must resolve those claims and upon notification of this finding, this court will dismiss this appeal to allow further proceedings in the district court. Should the district court decide to enter a new order disposing of the section 2 claims and to make it final and appealable pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b) and the plaintiffs should again appeal, this court would consider the issue on the present briefs, supplemented as the parties may desire.

REMANDED TO THE DISTRICT COURT WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lucas v. Townsend
967 F.2d 549 (Eleventh Circuit, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
943 F.2d 38, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 21523, 1991 WL 177752, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lucas-v-townsend-ca11-1991.