Lucas v. State

271 S.W. 1116, 100 Tex. Crim. 556, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 573

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lucas v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 109 Tex. Crim. 402 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided May 13, 1925·No. No. 8817.·Published

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge. —

Appellant was convicted in the district court of Taylor County of manufacturing intoxicating liquor; and his punishment fixed at one year in the penitentiary.

There are no bills of exception in the record. We have examined the statement of facts which amply supports the conclusion of guilt reached by the jury.

Finding no error in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LATTIMORE, Judge. —

Appellant was convicted in the district court of Taylor County of manufacturing intoxicating liquor; and his punishment fixed at one year in the penitentiary.

There are no bills of exception in the record. We have examined the statement of facts which amply supports the conclusion of guilt reached by the jury.

Finding no error in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Lucas v. State, 271 S.W. 1116, 100 Tex. Crim. 556, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 573 (Tex. 1925).

Pincite

271 S.W. 1116 (Lucas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.