Lucas v. State

215 S.W. 299, 86 Tex. Crim. 144, 1919 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 359
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 22, 1919
DocketNo. 5477.
StatusPublished

This text of 215 S.W. 299 (Lucas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lucas v. State, 215 S.W. 299, 86 Tex. Crim. 144, 1919 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 359 (Tex. 1919).

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of rape . on a girl within the statutory age under which rape could be committed with or without force, and with or without consent.

The motion for a new trial and the amended motion for a new trial are based upon the alleged error of the court in two respects in the admission of testimony. These are stated simply as grounds of the motion and are not perpetuated by bills of exception. In this attitude of the record the matters cannot be considered.

The judgment will, therefore, be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
215 S.W. 299, 86 Tex. Crim. 144, 1919 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lucas-v-state-texcrimapp-1919.