Lucas v. State

1940 OK CR 7, 98 P.2d 933, 68 Okla. Crim. 359, 1940 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 117
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedJanuary 25, 1940
DocketNo. A-9570.
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 1940 OK CR 7 (Lucas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lucas v. State, 1940 OK CR 7, 98 P.2d 933, 68 Okla. Crim. 359, 1940 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 117 (Okla. Ct. App. 1940).

Opinion

DOYLE, P. J.

The information in this case, after alleging time and place, charges that:

The said Slim Lucas, Horace Kelley, Clyde Duncan and Gene Ford, did, willfully, unlawfully, intentionally and feloniously, without justifiable or excusable cause, make an assault in and upon one George Alderson with a certain rock, said rock being then and there a dangerous and sharp instrument and weapon, and did then and there with said rock so had and held as aforesaid, strike, beat, bruise, cut, wound and injure the said George Aider-son, with the unlawful, wrongful, and felonious intent then and there to do bodily harm and injury to him.

Upon a separate trial plaintiff in error was found guilty of assault with a dangerous weapon without justifiable or excusable cause, and punishment assessed at imprisonment in the state penitentiary for a term of one year and one day, on which verdict judgment was rendered on April 1, 1938, from which judgment this appeal is prosecuted.

Counsel for plaintiff in error in his brief states:

“No objections or exceptions were saved in the trial of this case in the lower court, and I will have to raise my assignments of error and argue them in the face of this *361 court’s well-known rule, hoping this court will review the questions I ana raising in this brief because of the fact that the errors committed in this trial were fundamental and deprived the defendant of his substantial rights.”

The first assignment is:

“That the court committed error in forcing .the defendant into a separate trial, which depriyed him of his substantial rights.”

Counsel contends that a severance could only be had at the request of either of the defendants, because the state by informing against them jointly had thereby elected to try them jointly and was bound by such election.

The record does not show that a severance was demanded.

The Code of Criminal Procedure provides:

“When two or more defendants are jointly prosecuted for a felony, any defendant requiring it must be tried separately. In other cases defendants jointly prosecuted may be tried separately or jointly, in the discretion of the court.” Section 3065, O. S. 1931, 22 Okla. St. Ann. § 838.

The record shows that when the case was called for trial, and after the jury was impaneled, the county attorney made an opening statement to the jury as to what the state expected to show by the evidence. Thereupon the defendant reserved the right to make his opening statement at the close of the evidence in chief for the state. The record does not show that any objection to a separate trial was made, and the motion for a new trial did not include this assignment.

It follows from the foregoing that this assignment is without merit.

The only other proposition presented by counsel is the alleged insufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction.

*362 It is contended that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the conviction in that there is no corroboration of the testimony of the accomplice witness, Gene Ford.

It appears from the evidence that all the parties concerned were residents of Holdenville.

The first witness on behalf of the state, George Aider-son, testified:

“My age is 51 years, I was at the OK Pig Stand on February 7,1938, in company'with Jerry Lee. I was sitting on a stool at the counter, I had not drank anything except a ■ bottle of ginger ale, and Slim Lucas and Gene Ford came in and grabbed me and hit me several times, I was knocked senseless, when I came to, Bob Ho o ten was holding me, I was carried home, I am blind in one eye and for a week following I could not see out of my other eye, I have since been under the treatment and care of Dr. Wallace.”

Gene Ford, the next witness, testified:

“My age is 19 years. On February 7th about 3 o’clock, I was in the City Gafe. I had a bottle of beer with the Duncan boy, Slim Lucas came in, sat down with us and ordered some more beer. Slim got up and went over and sat on a stool, called me to him and bought three more bottles. After we drank it he said the George Alderson had snitched on him for selling alcohol, and he wanted me to whip Alderson, I said, ‘All right.” We sat there about an hour, he bought more beer and kept saying he wanted me to whip Alderson and I told him I would. It was around 4:30 when Horace Kelley came in and called Slim aside and said they are out there, Slim said to the Duncan boy and Horace, ‘Let’s go.’ I did not say anything. We went in Clyde Duncan’s car. We found George Alderson at the OK Pig Stand. On the way there they said if I got in jail they would pay my fine, and they said they would not let George get the best of me, and would not let any one else interfere and get on me. We drove up behind the Pig Stand, when we got out Slim picked up a rock and told me to hit him with it.” (Witness identified “Exhibit A” *363 as the rock iSlim picked up and handed to him.) “The Duncan boy, Horace Kelley, Slim and I went in. We just tried to go in the back door, but it was locked. When Slim said, ‘There is the snitching Son of a be-, get him.’ I hit him- twice, Slim grabbed a couple of beer bottles. Mrs. Stuart said Why don’t you let Slim do his own fighting.’ We came on up town, and they bought some more beer, they said I done a nice job, that if I got in jail they would pay my fine, and told me to sit tight. I was arrested about six o’clock, had a conversation with the sheriff the next morning, he asked me what I hit him with and I first told him with my fist, and then I told the same story I have told here on the witness stand. I did not have anything against George Alderson and hardly knew him, the only reason I beat him up was because Slim got me drunk; that he was one of the defendants named in the information.”
Bob Hooten testified that Slim Lucas, Gene Ford and two other boys came in, Gene rushed to George Aider-son and commenced hitting him with a rock; “Slim Lucas grabbed a couple of beer bottles and said, ‘Don’t any damn son of a b-interfere’. He ordered ¡Slim out; Slim said he would have to put him out; that Thelma Dugan had called the law, and Emmitt Poteet and Hugh McConnell came immediately, he told them to take Alderson to a doctor, that they could pick up the boys some other time, and told them who they were. That George Alderson stated that he could not see anything and they led him to a car, blood streaming down his face; that Ford hit the old man three or four times with a rock; that after he had pulled Gene Ford off Alderson he picked up a claw hammer and told Slim he would have to put him out, one of the boys grabbed Slim and said, ‘Let’s go,’ and they left.”

Witness said that he had been a peace officer and guard at the penitentiary.

Mrs. Lawrence Stuart testified that she owned and operated the OK Pig Stand, and was there behind the counter making a sandwich when Slim Lucas, Horace Kelley, Gene Ford and Clyde Duncan came in. That she *364

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Frick v. State
1973 OK CR 172 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1973)
Sanders v. State
1959 OK CR 74 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1959)
Rushing v. State
1948 OK CR 22 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1948)
Tipler v. State
1943 OK CR 127 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1943)
Richardson v. State
1943 OK CR 21 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1943)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1940 OK CR 7, 98 P.2d 933, 68 Okla. Crim. 359, 1940 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lucas-v-state-oklacrimapp-1940.