Lucas v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lucas v. State

148 So. 3d 150, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 15375, 2014 WL 4929058

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 3, 2014

DocketNo. 5D14-822

StatusPublished

This text of 148 So. 3d 150 (Lucas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lucas v. State, 148 So. 3d 150, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 15375, 2014 WL 4929058 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Travis Lucas appeals the trial court’s order summarily denying his rule 3.850 motion for postconviction relief as improperly successive. After considering the unique procedural history of this case, we conclude that good cause existed to allow the successive filing. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(h)(2). Accordingly, we reverse the order of the trial court and remand for consideration on the merits.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ORFINGER, COHEN and BERGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Travis Lucas appeals the trial court’s order summarily denying his rule 3.850 motion for postconviction relief as improperly successive. After considering the unique procedural history of this case, we conclude that good cause existed to allow the successive filing. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(h)(2). Accordingly, we reverse the order of the trial court and remand for consideration on the merits.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ORFINGER, COHEN and BERGER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

148 So. 3d 150, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 15375, 2014 WL 4929058, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lucas-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.