Lucas v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lucas v. State

148 So. 3d 150, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 15375, 2014 WL 4929058

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lucas v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 9010 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 3, 2014·No. No. 5D14-822·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Travis Lucas appeals the trial court’s order summarily denying his rule 3.850 motion for postconviction relief as improperly successive. After considering the unique procedural history of this case, we conclude that good cause existed to allow the successive filing. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(h)(2). Accordingly, we reverse the order of the trial court and remand for consideration on the merits.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ORFINGER, COHEN and BERGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Travis Lucas appeals the trial court’s order summarily denying his rule 3.850 motion for postconviction relief as improperly successive. After considering the unique procedural history of this case, we conclude that good cause existed to allow the successive filing. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(h)(2). Accordingly, we reverse the order of the trial court and remand for consideration on the merits.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ORFINGER, COHEN and BERGER, JJ., concur.

Lucas v. State, 148 So. 3d 150, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 15375, 2014 WL 4929058 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

148 So. 3d 150 (Lucas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.