Lucas v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lucas v. State

873 So. 2d 557, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 7055, 2004 WL 1123355

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 21, 2004

DocketNo. 1D03-2532

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 873 So. 2d 557 (Lucas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lucas v. State, 873 So. 2d 557, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 7055, 2004 WL 1123355 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Clentis Lucas, pled nolo con-tendere to one count of solicitation to commit first degree murder of his wife and was sentenced to twenty years in prison followed by ten years probation. Appellant filed a motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850 in the trial court, alleging ineffective assistance of counsel, and the trial court summarily denied the motion. Appellant contends that trial counsel failed to inform him of the existence of the defense of entrapment and that trial counsel improperly advised him as to what sentence he could expect. Because the record does not conclusively refute the appellant’s claim regarding the entrapment defense, we reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing on the issue or attachment of records conclusively refuting the claim. See State v. Glosson, 462 So.2d 1082, 1084 (Fla.1985)(rejecting the state’s contention that an informant receiving a benefit for cooperation and testimony in criminal prosecutions did not implicate due process concerns because government agents were not involved). [558]*558We affirm the trial court’s denial in all other aspects.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part and REMANDED with directions.

ALLEN, KAHN and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Clentis Lucas, pled nolo con-tendere to one count of solicitation to commit first degree murder of his wife and was sentenced to twenty years in prison followed by ten years probation. Appellant filed a motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850 in the trial court, alleging ineffective assistance of counsel, and the trial court summarily denied the motion. Appellant contends that trial counsel failed to inform him of the existence of the defense of entrapment and that trial counsel improperly advised him as to what sentence he could expect. Because the record does not conclusively refute the appellant’s claim regarding the entrapment defense, we reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing on the issue or attachment of records conclusively refuting the claim. See State v. Glosson, 462 So.2d 1082, 1084 (Fla.1985)(rejecting the state’s contention that an informant receiving a benefit for cooperation and testimony in criminal prosecutions did not implicate due process concerns because government agents were not involved). [558]*558We affirm the trial court’s denial in all other aspects.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part and REMANDED with directions.

ALLEN, KAHN and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

873 So. 2d 557, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 7055, 2004 WL 1123355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lucas-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack