Lucas v. State

873 So. 2d 557, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 7055, 2004 WL 1123355
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 21, 2004·No. No. 1D03-2532·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Clentis Lucas, pled nolo con-tendere to one count of solicitation to commit first degree murder of his wife and was sentenced to twenty years in prison followed by ten years probation. Appellant filed a motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850 in the trial court, alleging ineffective assistance of counsel, and the trial court summarily denied the motion. Appellant contends that trial counsel failed to inform him of the existence of the defense of entrapment and that trial counsel improperly advised him as to what sentence he could expect. Because the record does not conclusively refute the appellant’s claim regarding the entrapment defense, we reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing on the issue or attachment of records conclusively refuting the claim. See State v. Glosson, 462 So.2d 1082, 1084 (Fla.1985)(rejecting the state’s contention that an informant receiving a benefit for cooperation and testimony in criminal prosecutions did not implicate due process concerns because government agents were not involved). [558]*558We affirm the trial court’s denial in all other aspects.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part and REMANDED with directions.

ALLEN, KAHN and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lucas v. State, 873 So. 2d 557, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 7055, 2004 WL 1123355 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

873 So. 2d 557 (Lucas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gipson v. State
919 So. 2d 676 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)