Lucas v. Sevier

1 Tenn. 105
Tennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity·Decided March 6, 1805·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It is discretionary with the court, whether to permit this amendment or not. It is *106 certainly a discretion which should be exercised with great caution; the meaning seems doubtful; it appears proper that it should be explained, but we cannot admit the insertion of any new fact as an amendment. *

*

See 3 John 245. 1 John 61.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lucas v. Sevier, 1 Tenn. 105 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1805).

1 Tenn. 105 (Lucas v. Sevier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.