Lucas v. Samford

135 So. 576, 223 Ala. 235, 1931 Ala. LEXIS 203
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJune 18, 1931
Docket7 Div. 63.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 135 So. 576 (Lucas v. Samford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lucas v. Samford, 135 So. 576, 223 Ala. 235, 1931 Ala. LEXIS 203 (Ala. 1931).

Opinion

GARDNER, J.

The action in counts 2 and 3 was for work and labor done. Defendant’s plea in abatement to the effect that he was a resident of Montgomery county was insufficient and subject to the demurrer interposed thereto for failure to aver that the work and labor was not done in Shelby county where the suit was brought. Such an action may be maintained in the county where the work was done under the express provision of section 10468, Code 1923. Gay v. Cummings, 23 Ala. App. 8, 122 So. 313.

The court erred in overruling the demurrer to these pleas, and the judgment will accordingly be here reversed, the nonsuit set aside, and the cause restored to the docket for further proceedings in said court.

Reversed and remanded.

ANDERSON, C. J., and BOULDIN and FOSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rush v. THOMAS DUCKETT CONST. CO., INC.
380 So. 2d 762 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1979)
Boudrow v. H & R CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
222 So. 2d 154 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 So. 576, 223 Ala. 235, 1931 Ala. LEXIS 203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lucas-v-samford-ala-1931.