Lucas v. Michigan Bell

Michigan Supreme Court

Lucas v. Michigan Bell

708 N.W.2d 426, 474 Mich. 1025

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided January 30, 2006·No. 129624·Published

Opinion

708 N.W.2d 426 (2006) 474 Mich. 1025

Cyd C. LUCAS, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
MICHIGAN BELL (AMERITECH SERVICES, INC.), Defendant-Appellant.

Docket Nos. 129624 & (13), COA No. 261799.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

January 30, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 23, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to dismiss is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

708 N.W.2d 426 (2006) 474 Mich. 1025

Cyd C. LUCAS, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
MICHIGAN BELL (AMERITECH SERVICES, INC.), Defendant-Appellant.

Docket Nos. 129624 & (13), COA No. 261799.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

January 30, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 23, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to dismiss is DENIED.

Lucas v. Michigan Bell, 708 N.W.2d 426, 474 Mich. 1025 (Mich. 2006).

Pincite

708 N.W.2d 426 (Lucas v. Michigan Bell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Cyd C. LUCAS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MICHIGAN BELL (AMERITECH SERVICES, INC.), Defendant-Appellant.

Cyd C. LUCAS, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
MICHIGAN BELL (AMERITECH SERVICES, INC.), Defendant-Appellant.