Lucas v. Lewis

District Court, S.D. Ohio·Decided June 20, 2023·No. 1:22-cv-00741·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

ANGEL MARIE LUCAS,

Plaintiff, Case No. 1:22-cv-741 v. JUDGE DOUGLAS R. COLE Magistrate Judge Gentry NICHOLAS LEWIS, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER Troopers arrested Angel Marie Lucas for drug trafficking in October 2022.1 (Compl., Doc. 4, #62–65). Following her arrest, Lucas alleges two judges ordered her detained pending trial. (Id.). Proceeding pro se, Lucas invoked 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and sued the officers who arrested her and the judges who denied her pretrial release. (Doc. 4). Lucas’s claims related to an active state criminal case, so this Court stayed this matter under Younger v. Harris. (Doc. 5, #71–72). As a result, Lucas has not served any Defendant. Then, on June 12, 2023, Lucas moved to dismiss her Complaint without prejudice. (Doc. 13). Three days later, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation, advising the Court to grant Lucas’s Motion under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i). (Doc. 14). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i) allows a plaintiff to voluntarily “dismiss an action without a court order by filing a notice of dismissal before the

1 The Court limits its discussion here to only those facts necessary to rule on Lucas’s Motion to Dismiss. opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment.” The plaintiff does not need the court’s permission. Aamot v. Kassel, 1 F.3d 441, 443 (6th Cir. 1993). And “the court has no discretion to deny such a dismissal.” Jd. Finally, unless the plaintiff says otherwise or previously dismissed a claim based on the same facts, the court should dismiss without prejudice. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(B). Lucas has not served Defendants. Unsurprisingly then, no Defendant has answered or moved for summary judgment. Lucas has requested dismissal without prejudice, and the Court knows of no prior lawsuit under these same facts. Thus, the Court ADOPTS the R&R (Doc. 14), GRANTS Lucas’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 13), and DISMISSES her Complaint (Doc. 4) WITHOUT PREJUDICE. SO ORDERED. June 20, 2023 : DATE DOUGLAS R. COLE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lucas v. Lewis, (S.D. Ohio 2023).

Lucas v. Lewis (Lucas v. Lewis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Joann Aamot v. Robert L. Kassel
1 F.3d 441 (Sixth Circuit, 1993)