Lucas v. Kuhlengel
886 S.W.2d 140, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1495, 1994 WL 499505
Opinion
Plaintiff appeals from an order granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment. We affirm. Viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, the order of the trial court was proper, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lucas v. Kuhlengel, 886 S.W.2d 140, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1495, 1994 WL 499505 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).
886 S.W.2d 140 (Lucas v. Kuhlengel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Arroyo v. State
64 S.W.3d 81 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2001)