Lucas v. International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural and Ornamental Iron Workers

904 F.2d 707, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 25963, 53 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 912, 1990 WL 80919
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedJune 14, 1990
Docket89-3803
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 904 F.2d 707 (Lucas v. International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural and Ornamental Iron Workers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lucas v. International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural and Ornamental Iron Workers, 904 F.2d 707, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 25963, 53 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 912, 1990 WL 80919 (6th Cir. 1990).

Opinion

904 F.2d 707

53 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 912

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
William A. LUCAS; Tommie Marion, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BRIDGE, STRUCTURAL AND
ORNAMENTAL IRON WORKERS; Local 55, International
Association of Bridge, Structural and
Ornamental Iron Workers,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 89-3803.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

June 14, 1990.

Before KEITH and ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judges, and PATRICK J. DUGGAN, District Judge.*

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs, William A. Lucas, Jr. and Tommie Marion, appeal from the order of the district court granting summary judgment to defendants.

Having carefully considered the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties, we are unable to say that the district court erred in granting summary judgment to defendants.

As the reasons why judgment should be entered for defendants have been articulated by the district court, the issuance of a written opinion by this court would be duplicative and serve no useful purpose. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed upon the reasoning set out by that court in its opinion of July 28, 1989.

*

The Honorable Patrick J. Duggan, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dowden v. Tisch
902 F.2d 957 (Fifth Circuit, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
904 F.2d 707, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 25963, 53 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 912, 1990 WL 80919, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lucas-v-international-assn-of-bridge-structural-and-ornamental-iron-ca6-1990.