Lucas v. Hepburn

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lucas v. Hepburn

917 So. 2d 305, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 20034, 2005 WL 3481347

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 21, 2005·No. No. 3D05-2499·Published

Opinion

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Based on respondent Solomon Hepburn’s confession of error, we grant the petition for writ of certiorari. This ease is thus remanded with instructions that the trial court conduct an evidentiary hearing to determine whether Hepburn is a shareholder; whether he demonstrated that he properly requested to inspect the records of the subject corporations and was not allowed to do so; and whether this request was for a legitimate business purpose.

Petition granted with instructions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Based on respondent Solomon Hepburn’s confession of error, we grant the petition for writ of certiorari. This ease is thus remanded with instructions that the trial court conduct an evidentiary hearing to determine whether Hepburn is a shareholder; whether he demonstrated that he properly requested to inspect the records of the subject corporations and was not allowed to do so; and whether this request was for a legitimate business purpose.

Petition granted with instructions.

Lucas v. Hepburn, 917 So. 2d 305, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 20034, 2005 WL 3481347 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

917 So. 2d 305 (Lucas v. Hepburn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.