Lucas v. Commissioner of Correction

884 A.2d 1058, 92 Conn. App. 326, 2005 Conn. App. LEXIS 486
Connecticut Appellate Court·Decided November 15, 2005·No. AC 23887·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner, Kevin Lucas,1 appeals after the habeas court denied his petition for certifica[327] tion to appeal from the dismissal of his revised amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus in which he alleged ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We dismiss the appeal.

We carefully have reviewed the record and the briefs and conclude that the petitioner has not demonstrated that the issues he raises are debatable among jurists of reason, that a court could resolve the issues in a different manner or that the questions raised deserve encouragement to proceed further. See Lozada v. Deeds, 498 U.S. 430, 431-32, 111 S. Ct. 860, 112 L. Ed. 2d 956 (1991); Simms v. Warden, 230 Conn. 608, 616, 646 A.2d 126 (1994).

The appeal is dismissed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lucas v. Commissioner of Correction, 884 A.2d 1058, 92 Conn. App. 326, 2005 Conn. App. LEXIS 486 (Colo. Ct. App. 2005).

884 A.2d 1058 (Lucas v. Commissioner of Correction) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lucas v. Commissioner of Correction
901 A.2d 1223 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2006)