Lucas v. Brown
This text of Lucas v. Brown (Lucas v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7446
TYRONE LUCAS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ANGELA BROWN, DHO; CAPTAIN KEVIN FORD; CAPTAIN E. BITTENGER; CAPTAIN GASKINS; LIEUTENANT ALICE FLEMING; LIEUTENANT AUDREY PRICE; OFFICER SHANNON DEAN; OFFICER SAULS; OFFICER DONALD TUCKER; OFFICER PATRICIA COOK; VERNON TUCKER; MS. FLORENCE KLINE; MS. ANNASON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (1:09-cv-01601-TLW)
Submitted: March 31, 2011 Decided: April 5, 2011
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tyrone Lucas, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Barry Johnson, LEE ERTER WILSON HOLLER & SMITH, LLC, Sumter, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Tyrone Lucas appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
Lucas v. Brown, No. 1:09-cv-01601-TLW (D.S.C. Sept. 16, 2010).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lucas v. Brown, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lucas-v-brown-ca4-2011.