Lucas Morin v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 6, 2008
Docket13-07-00612-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Lucas Morin v. State (Lucas Morin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lucas Morin v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-07-612-CR



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

________________________________________________________



LUCAS MORIN, Appellant,



v.


THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

_________________________________________________________



On Appeal from the 156th District Court
of Bee County, Texas.

_______________________________________________________



MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam



Appellant, Lucas Morin, attempts to appeal his conviction for bail jumping and failure to appear. The trial court has certified that this "is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal." The trial court further certified that appellant waived his right to appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).

On November 8, 2007, this Court notified appellant's counsel of the trial court's certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether appellant has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel's findings as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the existence of any amended certification.

On January 17, 2008, counsel filed a letter brief with this Court. Counsel's response does not establish that the certification currently on file with this Court is incorrect or that appellant otherwise has a right to appeal.

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed if the trial court's certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d); see Tex. R. App. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED. Any pending motions are denied as moot.

PER CURIAM



Do not publish.

Tex.R.App.P. 47.2(b)

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 6th day of March, 2008.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lucas Morin v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lucas-morin-v-state-texapp-2008.