Lucas Electrical Services, Inc. v. United States

38 Cust. Ct. 538
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lucas Electrical Services, Inc. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 36 Cust. Ct. 209
United States Customs Court·Decided June 13, 1957·No. No. 60859; protests 203278-K, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

[539]*539Opinion by

La whence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” consist of ammeters similar in all material respects to those the subject of Lucas Electrical Services, Inc., and Frank J. Eberle Co. v. United States (36 Cust. Ct. 209, C. D. 1776), the claim at 12)4 percent under the provision in paragraph 369 (c), as modified, supra, for parts of automobiles was sustained. The items marked “B,” stipulated to consist of ammeters the same as those involved in C. D. 1776, except that the ammeters in the cited case were parts of automobiles whereas those in question are parts of motorcycles, were held dutiable at 15 percent under the provision in paragraph 369 (c), as modified, supra, for parts of motorcycles, as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lucas Electrical Services, Inc. v. United States, 38 Cust. Ct. 538 (cusc 1957).

38 Cust. Ct. 538 (Lucas Electrical Services, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lucas Electrical Services, Inc. v. United States
36 Cust. Ct. 209 (U.S. Customs Court, 1956)