Luca v. C. H. Winans Co.

135 A. 923, 5 N.J. Misc. 105, 1927 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 376
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJanuary 18, 1927
StatusPublished

This text of 135 A. 923 (Luca v. C. H. Winans Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Luca v. C. H. Winans Co., 135 A. 923, 5 N.J. Misc. 105, 1927 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 376 (N.J. 1927).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant was engaged, under contract with the board of freeholders of the county of Union, in repairing or resurfacing Springfield avenue from Summit to the Passaic Eiver bridge.

On September 25th, 1924, the plaintiff, Anthony Luca, a minor aged seventeen years, while riding on the rear seat of a motorcycle operated by one Olsen, was injured by being thrown as the motorcycle struck a pile of crushed stone placed by the defendant partly upon the roadway of Springfield avenue, and left, as is contended, unguarded by a light or other proper barrier. The accident happened after night fall. Action was brought against defendant and upon a trial thereof at the Union Circuit the infant plaintiff obtained a verdict of $5,000 and his father a verdict of $2,000.

Three reasons are urged why these verdicts should be set aside.

[106]*1061. Error in refusing to direct a verdict for the defendant because Springfield avenue had been closed to traffic by the board of chosen freeholders of Union county, and, therefore, the infant plaintiff was a trespasser, or, at best, a mere licensee, and there was no evidence of willful wg:ong-doing.

2. Refusal to charge requests 3, 4, 5 and 7 of defendant, and error in -charging plaintiffs’ request No. 6.

Our examination and consideration of the proofs and these reasons brings us to the conclusion that the verdicts should not be disturbed.

In some respects this case is not unlike that of Sadlon v. Jannarone, 132 Atl. Rep. 749.

The rule to show cause is discharged, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sadlon v. Jannarone
132 A. 749 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 A. 923, 5 N.J. Misc. 105, 1927 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luca-v-c-h-winans-co-nj-1927.