Luby v. State

791 So. 2d 1236, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11493, 2001 WL 929886
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 17, 2001·No. No. 5D01-1786·Published

Opinion

HARRIS, J.

Because appellant’s petition for certiora-ri was untimely filed, we are without jurisdiction and therefore dismiss the petition. This dismissal, however, is without prejudice to seek relief below based on the problems allegedly encountered in receiving a copy of the order. See Conklin v. Moore, 739 So.2d 714 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).

PETITION FOR CERTIORARI DISMISSED.

SAWAYA and ORFINGER, R.B., JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luby v. State, 791 So. 2d 1236, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11493, 2001 WL 929886 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

791 So. 2d 1236 (Luby v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Conklin v. Moore
739 So. 2d 714 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)