Lubula v. Rex Healthcare

620 F. App'x 207
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 22, 2015
DocketNo. 15-1346
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 620 F. App'x 207 (Lubula v. Rex Healthcare) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lubula v. Rex Healthcare, 620 F. App'x 207 (4th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kisoka Ngely Lubula appeals the district court’s, order granting Rex Healthcare’s summary judgment motion on her claims alleging she was constructively discharged, discriminated against and harassed on the basis of her race and national origin, and retaliated against for complaining of adverse treatment, in violation of Title VTI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2000e-17 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s [208]*208judgment. Lubula v. Rex Healthcare, No. 5:18-cv-00822-BO (E.D.N.C. Mar. 3, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
620 F. App'x 207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lubula-v-rex-healthcare-ca4-2015.