Lublin v. James T. Barnes & Co.
374 U.S. 94, 10 L. Ed. 2d 1027
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 10, 1963
DocketNo. 1040
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases
This text of 374 U.S. 94 (Lublin v. James T. Barnes & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lublin v. James T. Barnes & Co., 374 U.S. 94, 10 L. Ed. 2d 1027 (1963).
Opinion
The motion to dispense with printing the. jurisdictional Statement is granted.
The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Pinkerton v. State
784 P.2d 671 (Court of Appeals of Alaska, 1989)
State v. Bentley
472 P.2d 864 (Montana Supreme Court, 1970)
Uniformed Sanitation Men Association, Inc. v. Commissioner of Sanitation of the City of New York
426 F.2d 619 (Second Circuit, 1970)
United States ex rel. Zevin v. Cahn
282 F. Supp. 275 (E.D. New York, 1968)
United States Ex Rel. Laino v. Warden of Wallkill Prison
246 F. Supp. 72 (S.D. New York, 1965)
United States ex rel. Laino v. Wallack
231 F. Supp. 733 (S.D. New York, 1964)
Huggins v. State
1964 OK CR 4 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1964)
Donald Allen Bentley, Jr. v. Alaska
374 U.S. 106 (Supreme Court, 1963)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
374 U.S. 94, 10 L. Ed. 2d 1027, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lublin-v-james-t-barnes-co-scotus-1963.