Lubitz Bros. v. Abrams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lubitz Bros. v. Abrams

286 A.D. 871, 143 N.Y.S.2d 645, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4395

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 20, 1955

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 286 A.D. 871 (Lubitz Bros. v. Abrams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lubitz Bros. v. Abrams, 286 A.D. 871, 143 N.Y.S.2d 645, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4395 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding to review a determination of respondent, which denies an application for an increase of rents as a result of converting from a coal-fired furnace to an oil-fired system in an eight-family apartment house, the appeal is from an order dismissing the proceeding. Appellant contends that as matter of law the conversion was a “ substantial rehabilitation” of the property or a “ major capital improvement” within the meaning of the State Residential Rent Law (L. 1946, eh. 274, as amd.). Order unanimously affirmed,, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ. [See post, p. 968.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to review a determination of respondent, which denies an application for an increase of rents as a result of converting from a coal-fired furnace to an oil-fired system in an eight-family apartment house, the appeal is from an order dismissing the proceeding. Appellant contends that as matter of law the conversion was a “ substantial rehabilitation” of the property or a “ major capital improvement” within the meaning of the State Residential Rent Law (L. 1946, eh. 274, as amd.). Order unanimously affirmed,, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ. [See post, p. 968.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

286 A.D. 871, 143 N.Y.S.2d 645, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lubitz-bros-v-abrams-nyappdiv-1955.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack